Skip to content
Peptideworth

Ranked board

The sellers that say anything at all about how their product is tested

There are two very different statements a company can make about testing, and they are usually printed in the same typeface. One describes a regime: what is tested, how often, by whom. The other is the word “tested” on a landing page. This board is the companies that do the first. The number that publish a certificate a customer can actually read is on the tile below, and it is zero.

By Grant Delaney, Research Editor

Disclosure: Some links on this site are affiliate or referral links. If you start a treatment or buy a product through them, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Read our full disclosure.

What gets on this board

Every published review where the company describes a testing regime on its own site — what is tested, or by whom, or how often. The word “tested” with nothing behind it does not qualify, and publishing a readable certificate of analysis is a separate and stricter test that no company reviewed here currently passes.

What decides the order

Companies we have a paid relationship with are listed first, and we say so here rather than marking individual rows. Within that group and within the rest, the order is the same measured one: how much of what each company sells is described accurately — the share of the products this board counts whose marketing claim matches the trials behind it. Ties go to the company with more matching claims, then to the one that names its pharmacy, then to the one that publishes a testing regime, and last of all to alphabetical order. Being a partner changes where a company sits, never what its numbers say.

What the grading found

16/96

Claims that match the trials

Across every one of these companies' graded products that we have graded.

10/18

Name their pharmacy

A telehealth brand is almost never the pharmacy that fills the order.

1

Publish a readable certificate

Of every company reviewed on this site, not just those on this board.

The ranking

Every product counted here was graded against the published trials for that molecule, using the company's own words about it. The three counts below are that grading, and they are the ranking — there is no score, no weighting and no adjustment behind them.

The testing disclosure is what puts a company on this board; the counts beside it are its whole graded catalog, so the ranking still turns on claim accuracy rather than on the disclosure itself.

CompanyClaims vs. trialsDisclosesVisit
Trimi

Checked August 2026

2/2100%

  • 0 reach past the trials
  • 0 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shown
Visit
Eden

Checked August 2026

3/650%

  • 1 reach past the trials
  • 2 with no trial behind them
Testing shown
Visit
DirectMeds

Checked August 2026

1/425%

  • 0 reach past the trials
  • 3 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shown
Visit
Oak Longevity

Checked August 2026

0/40%

  • 1 reach past the trials
  • 3 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shown
Visit
SkinnyRx

Checked August 2026

0/30%

  • 2 reach past the trials
  • 1 with no trial behind them
Testing shown
Visit
Trellis Vitality

Checked August 2026

2/540%

  • 1 reach past the trials
  • 2 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shown
Visit
Maximus

Checked August 2026

2/540%

  • 1 reach past the trials
  • 2 with no trial behind them
Testing shown
Visit
Regenics

Checked August 2026

2/633%

  • 1 reach past the trials
  • 3 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shown
Visit
1st Optimal

Checked August 2026

1/425%

  • 0 reach past the trials
  • 3 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shown
Visit
GOAL.MD

Checked August 2026

1/425%

  • 2 reach past the trials
  • 1 with no trial behind them
Testing shown
Visit
AgelessRx

Checked August 2026

1/617%

  • 3 reach past the trials
  • 2 with no trial behind them
Testing shown
Visit
Valhalla Vitality

Checked August 2026

1/617%

  • 2 reach past the trials
  • 3 with no trial behind them
Testing shown
Visit
Alinwell

Checked September 2026

0/110%

  • 6 reach past the trials
  • 5 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shownCertificate public
Visit
Invigor Medical

Checked August 2026

0/50%

  • 3 reach past the trials
  • 2 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shown
Visit
PeptidesRx

Checked August 2026

0/100%

  • 4 reach past the trials
  • 6 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shown
Not linked
The Edit Health

Checked August 2026

0/60%

  • 3 reach past the trials
  • 3 with no trial behind them
Pharmacy namedTesting shown
Visit
Lighter You

Checked August 2026

0/40%

  • 1 reach past the trials
  • 3 with no trial behind them
Testing shown
Visit
VAULT Men's Health

Checked August 2026

0/50%

  • 2 reach past the trials
  • 3 with no trial behind them
Testing shown
Not linked

How a claim is graded, and what moves a compound between evidence tiers, is on our methodology page.

What this board does not measure

Whether it works

A company can describe a weakly-evidenced product accurately and rank well here. What the evidence says about each molecule is on its own graded compound page, and the two questions are deliberately kept apart.

Clinical care

We read public pages. We have not been a patient of any of these companies, have not assessed a consultation, and publish no quality score of any kind.

Price

Prices appear on a review as a note where a company publishes one, and they are not part of this ranking. A cheaper company is not lower here and a dearer one is not higher.

Product quality

Only 1 of the companies reviewed here publish a certificate of analysis a customer can read, and a certificate is not on this board's ranking axis. Nothing here tells you what is in a vial.

Considered, and not on this board

76 companies were inside this board's candidate net and did not meet its rule. Each one has a published review here, and none was left off for an unflattering result.

  • AHBARx

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published for any peptide. …”

  • Alan Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency result, purity result or third-party test is published or offered, and no pharmacy is named that could be asked for one. …”

  • Andrew Meds

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency result, purity result or sterility result is published for either peptide. …”

  • Auren Rx

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing is published. …”

  • Believe Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing is published. A census of the peptides page on 2026-09-01 returned zero occurrences of "certificate of analysis" or "COA" in the visible text, and no potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere on the site. …”

  • Belle Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis is published, offered on request, or mentioned. …”

  • Bliv

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency result, purity result, sterility standard, named laboratory or testing statement of any kind appears on the site, checked 2026-08-26 across the single served page, the eleven expanded FAQ answers, the terms, the refund policy, the HIPAA policy and the telehealth consent form. …”

  • Bodybuilding Health+

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published. …”

  • BreezeMeds

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product. …”

  • CareBareRX

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product. …”

  • Clume Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published, and no compounding category is stated for any of the four named pharmacies. …”

  • Collective

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published. …”

  • CoreAge Rx

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing is published — no certificate of analysis, no lot number, no potency or sterility result, no named laboratory, no batch lookup, for any product. …”

  • Defy Medical

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing is published about the testing of any dispensed preparation. …”

  • DudeMeds

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published for any product. …”

  • Edessa

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere on the site. …”

  • Embody

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing is published. No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup — and no pharmacy named to ask, no compounding category stated, and no active ingredient identified. …”

  • Enhance.MD

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product, and no pharmacy is named to ask for one. …”

  • Eviora MD

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere on the site or in the signup. …”

  • Fella Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency result, purity result, named laboratory or lot reference is published or offered, re-checked 2026-08-26, and no pharmacy is named who could be asked for one. …”

  • Found

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any compounded product, and no pharmacy is named to ask. …”

  • Gala GLP-1

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product — and because no pharmacy is named either, there is no party a patient could approach for one. …”

  • Goldspan Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published for any of the 29 products. …”

  • He & She MD

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis is published, offered on request, or mentioned. …”

  • HealthRX

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published. …”

  • Hone Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing, and the nothing was measured. On August 9, 2026 we downloaded 107 of the 109 pages Hone's site publishes (two blog sections would not load) — about ten million characters — and searched all of it. …”

  • HumeCare+

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis is published, offered on request, or mentioned. …”

  • Idgie Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere — and neither does the marketing that usually stands in for one. …”

  • Joi + Blokes

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No page reached in this review describes a testing regime for the compounded products — no potency specification, no sterility standard, no certificate of analysis, and no laboratory named. …”

  • Lean Meds

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published. …”

  • Live Vital

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing is published. No certificate of analysis, no batch record, no potency or sterility result, no named laboratory, no lot lookup — across the whole site. …”

  • Longevixx

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing. A census of the peptides page on 2026-09-01 returns zero occurrences of "certificate of analysis" or "COA" in the visible text, and no potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere on the site. …”

  • LumiMeds

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency result or purity result is published or offered, and no pharmacy is named who could be asked for one.”

  • Luvo Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere. …”

  • Magnolia Regenerative Medicine

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published for any of the 24 products. …”

  • MangoRx

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result or batch lookup is published for any product. …”

  • Marek Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Marek describes no testing regime for any prescription product, and the measurement is a clean one. …”

  • MEDGm

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published. …”

  • Mondae

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published for any of the three peptides. …”

  • MyDrHank

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published, and no third-party certification is displayed. …”

  • NEUVÉ Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency result, purity result or sterility result is published anywhere on the site. …”

  • New Wave Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere on the site or in the signup. …”

  • Nex Gen Health Rx

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published for any of the four peptides. …”

  • No BS RX

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No BS RX makes the most specific sourcing claim in this batch and publishes nothing to back it. …”

  • Nova

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Every page header carries the line "Third party tested medications delivered directly to your door", and no test result, certificate of analysis, potency figure or purity figure is published anywhere to go with it. …”

  • NovoCare Pharmacy

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “There is no lot-testing page, and there should not be one. …”

  • Oria Meds

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published. …”

  • Pallas Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product — the same gap as every other company in this wave, and the one thing Pallas's otherwise excellent disclosure does not cover. …”

  • Peak Wellness

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis or test result is published, despite the compounding pharmacy being named. …”

  • Polly (formerly Piper)

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency result or purity result is published or offered, and no pharmacy is named who could be asked for one.”

  • Prime Doctor RX

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere on the site — and neither does any of the marketing that usually stands in for one. …”

  • Rehydra+ Wellness

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing. …”

  • Renlo Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere on the site. …”

  • RX Bella

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere. …”

  • Rx.com

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere. Its LegitScript certification is real and belongs to this domain — the certificate image loads for rx. …”

  • RxSpan MD

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published — and neither is a billing period or a product page. …”

  • Science & Co

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere on the site. …”

  • Sesame Care

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number or potency result is published, and for the product reviewed here that is the expected answer rather than a gap: an FDA-approved finished drug carries its manufacturer's own quality system and an NDC, so batch documents are not something a telehealth marketplace would hold or publish. …”

  • SexyMD

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published. …”

  • Shed

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product, and no pharmacy is named to ask. …”

  • SnagRx

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result or testing laboratory is published. …”

  • Solaya MD

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published for any peptide, and no compounding category is stated for the named pharmacy. …”

  • Sprout Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published — and after the warning letter, very little else is either. …”

  • Strut Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, batch record, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or lot lookup is published anywhere on the site, for any product. …”

  • Superior Remedies

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result or testing laboratory is published. …”

  • Synergy Rx

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product. …”

  • telos rx

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product — the same gap as every other company we've reviewed, and the one substantial thing missing from an otherwise unusually transparent site. …”

  • TOM Weight Loss

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency result, purity result, sterility standard or named laboratory is published or offered, re-checked 2026-08-26 across the homepage, the pricing page, the eligibility page and the areas-served page. …”

  • Transcend

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Transcend describes no testing regime for any compounded product, and unusually it does not claim one either. …”

  • Trava Health

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Testing is the site's headline assurance and nothing supports it. No certificate of analysis, potency result, purity result or third-party report is published or offered, and no laboratory or pharmacy is named that could supply one. …”

  • Try Ageless

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “"Every batch independently tested for potency and sterility" is asserted, and nothing is published to check it against: no certificate of analysis, no lot number, no testing laboratory and no potency or sterility result appears on the site. …”

  • VevaRX

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published for any peptide. …”

  • Vyvron

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “Nothing. This is the clearest finding on the review and it was measured rather than inferred. …”

  • WellMedr

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product, and no pharmacy is named to ask. …”

  • Wellorithm

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears anywhere. What Wellorithm publishes instead is volume and personalization — more than 1,200,000 prescriptions written, over 50,000 success stories, a 4. …”

  • yourEra

    Describes no testing regime on its own site. What its review found: “No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published. …”

Frequently asked questions

Why is “publishes a certificate of analysis” not the rule for this board?

Because no company reviewed here does it, and a board with no rows is not a board. The certificate is the standard worth holding — a lot-specific report a prospective customer can read before buying — and the count of companies meeting it is printed on every board on this site precisely because it stays at zero.

Does describing a testing regime mean the testing happened?

No. It means the company has committed to something specific in public, which is checkable and which a vaguer competitor has not done. We have not audited a laboratory, seen a lot report, or verified any of these statements against a document. This board measures what is published, which is the only thing we can measure from outside.

Nothing pinned

Companies we have a paid relationship with are listed first, and we say so here rather than marking individual rows. Within that group and within the rest, the order is the same measured one: how much of what each company sells is described accurately — the share of the products this board counts whose marketing claim matches the trials behind it. Ties go to the company with more matching claims, then to the one that names its pharmacy, then to the one that publishes a testing regime, and last of all to alphabetical order. Being a partner changes where a company sits, never what its numbers say.

Medical disclaimer: This content is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any treatment.