Provider review
Mondae Review: Three Peptides, Three Different Distances From the Evidence
Mondae sells three peptides and describes each in a single line built from the same template. Sermorelin is "for growth hormone signaling" — a mechanism the trials actually measured, and one of the more careful claims on this site. NAD+ is "for cellular support" and glutathione is "for antioxidant support & wellness", which name nothing anyone could test while using the word support to imply a benefit. It names its pharmacy on these three pages and on neither of its GLP-1 pages, and its homepage prices all three wrong.
One of its three peptide claims stops where the evidence stops. The other two use the word "support" to gesture at benefits no trial has measured.
Worth trusting if
- You want product copy that names a mechanism rather than promising an outcome, which its sermorelin page does
- You want a pharmacy named at all, which its peptide pages do and its GLP-1 pages do not
- You want the price visible on a public page before any questionnaire
Be skeptical if
- You budgeted from the homepage grid, which prints the three-month rate under the words "Billed monthly"
- You want a certificate of analysis, because none is published
- You want to know which additives are in your vial, which the site raises and does not answer
Compounded only
No trial for this use
Named
None found
Disclosure: Some links on this site are affiliate or referral links. If you start a treatment or buy a product through them, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Read our full disclosure.
Opens mondae.com. A link is not a recommendation to take anything.
Provenance
What Mondae actually dispenses
Regulatory category is the axis consumers are most reliably misled about, so it comes first. Every product below is sorted by what it legally is, not by what it costs.
Prepared by a state-licensed pharmacy against a prescription for a named patient. Compounded preparations are not FDA-approved and are not reviewed by FDA for safety, effectiveness or quality.
- Sermorelin injection — $129 a month, or $99 on a three-month plan. The homepage prints $99 under the words "Billed monthly", which describes the prepay rate rather than the monthly one.
- NAD+ injection — $129 a month, $93 on three months.
- Glutathione injection — $99 a month, $63 on three months — the cheapest product Mondae sells.
Evidence
Has the molecule been tested for what it is sold for?
One row per product, graded on how far the published human evidence goes for the MOLECULE inside it, for the use it is sold for — not for the molecule in general, and never a claim about this seller. Nobody trials a compounded preparation; what a trial can tell you is whether the molecule has been tested for the thing it is being advertised to do. A molecule with phase 3 evidence for one outcome has none for another, and that distinction is where peptide marketing lives.
0
Molecules with human evidence
For the use they are sold for, out of 3 products reviewed here. The evidence belongs to the molecule, not to Mondae.
0
Registry records cited
Each read live from ClinicalTrials.gov, never from memory. None of them tested this company's product.
The comparison
What they claim, against what the trials show
Each claim below is quoted verbatim from Mondae’s own page, with the page it came from. Grading a paraphrase would prove nothing. Every row is the verdict at a glance — tap it to open the quote, the trial registry entries, and the full note behind that verdict.
Sermorelin injectionSermorelin · Compounded (503A)Claim matches the trials
“Provider-directed injection for growth hormone signaling”
Read on the Mondae site, September 2026
No trial for this use
What the trials show for Sermorelin
As of August 2026, a PubMed search for sermorelin filtered to the randomized-controlled-trial publication type returned 19 records, the most recent published in 2005. Every one measures growth hormone secretion, growth in children, or the response to a diagnostic challenge. None tests recovery, sleep, body composition or vitality as an outcome in healthy adults. A parallel ClinicalTrials.gov search returned 27 studies; the two closest to a marketed anti-aging use are both phase 2 and both terminated, at 13 and 5 participants.
Five words, and they stop exactly where the evidence stops. Growth hormone signaling is what sermorelin does and what all nineteen randomized trials measured — secretion, or the response to a diagnostic challenge. What Mondae does not do is take the next step every other seller of this molecule takes, into recovery, sleep, vitality or body composition, none of which any of those trials tested. Read the verdict precisely: the claim is accurate about mechanism and promises no clinical benefit, which is why there is nothing here to correct.1
NAD+ injectionNAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) · Compounded (503A)No trial supports this claim
“Provider-directed injection for cellular support”
Read on the Mondae site, September 2026
No trial for this use
As of August 2026, a ClinicalTrials.gov intervention search for injected NAD+ in humans returns no completed randomized trial supporting a restoration-of-function claim, and a PubMed search for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide combined with injection or subcutaneous, filtered to the randomized-controlled-trial publication type, returns zero records. The substantial human literature concerns ORAL precursors — nicotinamide riboside and nicotinamide mononucleotide — which are different molecules by a different route.
"Cellular support" is vague in a way that works only in one direction. It names no outcome a trial could measure — not energy, not cognition, not aging — while the word support carries the implication that something is being helped. Nothing has been: no completed randomized trial of injected NAD+ in humans exists. Compare the sermorelin line on the same site, which names a mechanism that was actually measured. The template is identical; the distance from the evidence is not.2
Glutathione injectionGlutathione · Compounded (503A)No trial supports this claim
“Provider-directed injection for antioxidant support & wellness”
Read on the Mondae site, September 2026
No trial for this use
What the trials show for Glutathione
As of August 2026, a PubMed search for glutathione in title or abstract, combined with an injected route and with skin, detoxification, fatigue or energy, restricted to the randomized-controlled-trial publication type, returned seven records. Not one tests injected glutathione on its own for any of those outcomes. On ClinicalTrials.gov, 268 studies list glutathione as an intervention; restricting to injected routes returns three, in mantle-cell lymphoma, acute liver failure and pneumonia.
Glutathione is an antioxidant inside a cell — that is biochemistry, and it is true of the molecule whether or not injecting it does anything. "Wellness" is the word that turns a fact about chemistry into an offer, and no trial of injected glutathione in a healthy adult has measured it or anything like it. The seven randomized records that a targeted search returns test something else entirely.3
Dispensing chain
Who actually fills your prescription
- Greenwich — named as the only option in a pharmacy picker on the sermorelin, NAD+ and glutathione pages. No legal name, state or address is published for it.
Read the full account
Mondae names a pharmacy on these three peptide pages and on neither of its two GLP-1 pages, which is an unusual asymmetry. The picker sits under the heading "Pharmacy — Each pharmacy ships to different states, and may contain additional additives", offers exactly one choice, and gives that choice no legal name, no state and no address. Neither 503A nor 503B appears anywhere on the site, so the compounding class is unstated. The telehealth entity IS named and located: Bask Telehealth LLC, 555 Madison Ave., Suite 1202, New York. No individual prescriber or medical group is published. Alinwell's peptide certificates name a compounder called "Greenwich Rx"; the two share a first word and nothing else that either site publishes, and no relationship is asserted here.
Read on the Mondae site, September 2026.
Quality
Third-party testing, and what is published
Describes a testing regime
Nothing published on the pages searched
Certificate of analysis readable
No lot report a buyer can open
Read the full testing account
No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result is published for any of the three peptides. The one quality-adjacent statement is a warning rather than a reassurance: the pharmacy picker says each pharmacy "may contain additional additives", without saying which additives, in which product, or from which pharmacy. That is more candid than most sellers manage and less useful than it sounds, because the picker offers only one option and names it with a single word.
Read on the Mondae site, September 2026.
Licensing
Licensed to dispense, and where
Coverage
Mondae says it is available in all 50 states, and its intake's shipping selector offers 51 options once the District of Columbia is counted. Its shipping policy narrows that in a practical way worth knowing: it does not ship to P.O. boxes, to APO or FPO addresses, or internationally. No state is excluded by name anywhere.
Read the full licensing claim
"Mondae is a telehealth platform that connects eligible patients with licensed healthcare providers for evaluation and, when medically appropriate, prescription treatment. If prescribed, medications are dispensed and shipped by a licensed pharmacy." No license number or prescriber name is published.
Read on the Mondae site, September 2026.
Regulatory
The FDA warning letter
Checked, and none found
Assessment
What holds up, and what does not
- Its sermorelin claim names growth hormone signaling and stops there — the mechanism nineteen randomized trials actually measured, with none of the recovery or vitality claims other sellers add.
- It names a pharmacy on all three peptide pages, which neither of its GLP-1 pages does.
- It names its telehealth entity in full, Bask Telehealth LLC, with a New York address.
Show 4 more
- All three prices are on public treatment pages before any questionnaire, account or email.
- It discloses that a pharmacy's preparation "may contain additional additives", which almost nothing else in this category mentions at all.
- Its LegitScript certification resolves.
- No FDA warning letter.
- The homepage prices all three peptides at their three-month rate under the words "Billed monthly" — $99, $93 and $63 against real monthly rates of $129, $129 and $99.
- "Cellular support" and "antioxidant support & wellness" name no outcome any trial could measure, while implying a benefit.
- No certificate of analysis, potency or purity result is published for any of the three products.
Show 5 more
- The pharmacy it names is named with one word — no legal name, no state, no address — and the picker offers no alternative to choose between.
- It raises the question of additives and does not answer it: which additives, in which product, from which pharmacy.
- Neither 503A nor 503B appears anywhere on the site, so the compounding class is never stated.
- A hidden $600 struck-through price ships on all five treatment pages, including on a product sold for under a hundred dollars.
- No individual prescriber or medical group is named anywhere.
Verdict
The bottom line
Read the sermorelin page as the standard the other two miss. It names a mechanism, that mechanism is what the trials measured, and it promises nothing beyond it — which is the whole of what an honest peptide claim looks like. Then note that "cellular support" and "antioxidant support & wellness" are the same sentence with the evidence taken out, that no certificate of analysis exists for any of the three, and that the prices on the homepage are three-month rates wearing the words "Billed monthly".
Opens mondae.com. A link is not a recommendation to take anything.
Three products, one sentence template, three different claims
Mondae describes each peptide in a single line, and the lines are built the same way:
Sermorelin — "Provider-directed injection for growth hormone signaling"
NAD+ — "Provider-directed injection for cellular support"
Glutathione — "Provider-directed injection for antioxidant support & wellness"
Identical scaffolding. Very different distances from the evidence.
"Growth hormone signaling" is a mechanism, and it is the mechanism nineteen randomized trials of sermorelin actually measured — secretion, or the response to a diagnostic challenge. 1 The claim stops there. It does not go on to recovery, sleep, vitality or body composition, which is where nearly every other seller of this molecule goes and where no trial follows.
"Cellular support" names nothing. Not energy, not cognition, not aging — nothing a trial could be designed to measure. What it does carry is the word support, which implies something is being helped. Nothing is: there is no completed randomized trial of injected NAD+ in humans at all. 2
"Antioxidant support & wellness" is the same move with an extra step. Glutathione genuinely is an antioxidant inside a cell — that is chemistry, true of the molecule whether or not injecting it achieves anything. "Wellness" is the word that converts the chemistry into an offer, and no trial of injected glutathione in a healthy adult has measured it. 3
So one of three claims survives, and it survives by being modest.
Full analysis — 3 more sectionsThe pharmacy it names, and the one it does not · What the homepage says the prices are · What is not published
The pharmacy it names, and the one it does not
On all three peptide pages there is a picker:
"Pharmacy — Each pharmacy ships to different states, and may contain additional additives. Greenwich"
One option. One word. No legal name, no state, no address.
Neither of Mondae's two GLP-1 pages names a pharmacy at all, which makes this an odd asymmetry — the products with the weakest evidence get the disclosure and the products with the strongest do not.
The additive warning is worth its own line. Almost nothing else in this category mentions additives at all, and raising the question is more candid than staying silent. It is also unanswered: which additives, in which product, from which pharmacy.
What the homepage says the prices are
| Product | Homepage grid | Actual monthly | |---|---|---| | Sermorelin | "From $99 / Billed monthly" | $129 | | NAD+ | "From $93 / Billed monthly" | $129 | | Glutathione | "From $63 / Billed monthly" | $99 |
Every figure in that middle column is the three-month prepay rate, printed under the words "Billed monthly".
There is also a struck-through $600 in the markup of all five treatment pages, inside a container that never displays. It does not render, so it is not a price — but on the glutathione page it would imply an 83% discount if it did.
What is not published
No certificate of analysis. No potency result. No purity result. No compounding class — neither 503A nor 503B appears anywhere. No prescriber or medical group.
The telehealth entity is named and located, which is more than most: Bask Telehealth LLC, 555 Madison Ave., Suite 1202, New York.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Which of Mondae's peptide claims holds up?
The sermorelin one. "Provider-directed injection for growth hormone signaling" names a mechanism, and growth hormone secretion is exactly what all nineteen randomized trials of sermorelin measured. It does not go on to claim recovery, sleep or body composition, which is where the evidence runs out and where most sellers keep going.
What is wrong with "cellular support"?
It names no outcome. Energy, cognition and aging are things a trial could measure; "cellular support" is not, and no completed randomized trial of injected NAD+ in humans exists to support any of them. The word support does the work of a benefit claim without being one, which is why it cannot be checked.
Why does the homepage say sermorelin is $99?
Because it prints the three-month rate and labels it "Billed monthly". Buying a month at a time costs $129. NAD+ and glutathione do the same thing — $93 against $129, and $63 against $99.
Which pharmacy compounds these?
A pharmacy Mondae calls "Greenwich", named on all three peptide pages as the only option in a picker. No legal name, state or address is given for it, and the compounding class is never stated. Neither of Mondae's GLP-1 pages names a pharmacy at all.
Does Mondae publish test results?
No certificate of analysis, potency, purity or sterility result appears for any of the three peptides. Its pages do warn that a pharmacy's preparation "may contain additional additives", which is unusually candid — and it does not say which additives, in which product.
Glossary
Key terms
Show definitions
- Growth hormone signaling
- A mechanism: sermorelin prompts the pituitary to release growth hormone. It describes what happens in the body, not what a patient would notice, and the two are different claims.
- Antioxidant
- A molecule that neutralizes reactive oxygen species inside a cell. It is a description of chemistry, and is true of glutathione whether or not injecting it produces any effect a person could feel.
Compare
Others selling what Mondae sells
Companies we have also reviewed that dispense at least one of the same compounds, ordered by how much of what they say about their products matches the trials behind them. Nothing here is a recommendation, and none of these links earns us anything.
- Belle HealthAlso sells Sermorelin · 3 of 3 claims match the trials
- Pallas HealthAlso sells NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) · 4 of 4 claims match the trials
- ShedAlso sells Sermorelin · 4 of 6 claims match the trials
- CareBareRXAlso sells NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) · 2 of 4 claims match the trials
Method
How we checked this
Non-product facts last checked September 2026. Read the editorial policy for the rules this page is held to.
Read our methodology
Claims read first-party
Every quoted claim was read off Mondae's own pages, first-hand, on the date stamped against it — never from a summary, an aggregator, or an earlier version of this review.
Trials read from the registry
Phase, status and enrollment come from ClinicalTrials.gov; identifiers and journals from PubMed's own records. Nothing here is cited from memory.
Absence claims bounded
Where we report that no trial exists, the page says what was searched, where, and when — never an unbounded claim that nobody has tested something.
Letters matched on full name
FDA letters are matched on the complete company name. A substring match would attach one firm's regulatory history to another with a similar name.
Sources
References
Show all 3 sources
- US National Library of Medicine (2026). PubMed search: sermorelin AND randomized controlled trial[pt] — 19 records, most recent 2005; ClinicalTrials.gov intervention "sermorelin" — 27 studies. PubMed / ClinicalTrials.gov. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=sermorelin+AND+randomized+controlled+trial%5Bpt%5D
- US National Library of Medicine (2026). PubMed search: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide AND (injection OR subcutaneous) AND randomized controlled trial[pt] — zero records for injected NAD+ in humans. PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=nicotinamide+adenine+dinucleotide+AND+injection+AND+randomized+controlled+trial%5Bpt%5D
- US National Library of Medicine (2026). PubMed search: glutathione[tiab] AND injected route AND (skin OR detoxification OR fatigue OR energy) AND randomized controlled trial[pt] — 7 records, none testing injected glutathione alone; ClinicalTrials.gov injected-route glutathione — 3 studies, in lymphoma, acute liver failure and pneumonia. PubMed / ClinicalTrials.gov. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=glutathione%5Btiab%5D+AND+randomized+controlled+trial%5Bpt%5D
Medical disclaimer: This content is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any treatment.