The sellers that tell you which pharmacy actually fills your prescription

The company you order from and the pharmacy that makes what arrives are usually two different businesses, and most brands never tell you the second one's name. Without it you cannot check the pharmacy's license, its inspection history, or whether it has been warned about anything. These are the sellers that publish it.

Every product counted here was graded against the published trials for that molecule, using the company's own words about it. The three counts below are that grading, and they are the ranking — there is no score, no weighting and no adjustment behind them.

The disclosure is what puts a company on this board; the counts beside it are its whole graded catalog, exactly as on the main board.

How a claim is graded, and what moves a compound between evidence tiers, is on our methodology page.

65 companies were inside this board's candidate net and did not meet its rule. Each one has a published review here, and none was left off for an unflattering result.

• AgelessRx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “For everything AgelessRx compounds, the pharmacy is never named. …”

• AHBARx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “AHBARx names three partners and none of them is presented accurately as its dispensing pharmacy. …”

• Alan Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. Alan says it supplies “U.S. …”

• Alinwell

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named for the peptides. Each peptide page says only that "Alinwell protocols are prepared by partner compounding pharmacies in the United States", and "503A" and "503B" appear nowhere on the site. …”

• Andrew Meds

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on the site, and no compounding class is stated — the copy says "compounded" throughout and never cites 503A or 503B. …”

• Believe Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere. …”

• bmiMD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The reviewed public offer does not identify the pharmacy assigned to an individual prescription. …”

• Collective

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named, and no clinician, medical director or advisory name is published anywhere on the marketing site. …”

• CoreAge Rx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere a customer would look. …”

• Defy Medical

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Defy operates a page at /about-us/about-us-vendor-information/ headed "Defy Medical Vendor Information," with a section headed "Pharmacy. …”

• DudeMeds

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named for either side of the business. …”

• Eden

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No Eden product page names the pharmacy that compounded the prescription. …”

• Enhance MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. …”

• Eviora MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. …”

• Fella Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named, and no regulatory category — 503A or 503B — is stated on the homepage, /treatments, /about/states, /guarantee or any of the 27 screens of the quiz. …”

• Found

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named. …”

• Gala GLP-1

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. …”

• GOAL MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. …”

• Goldspan Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on either domain. Goldspan states a class and stops: "All therapies are dispensed by a pharmacy licensed under U. …”

• He & She MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on their site. The FAQ carries the question “Who are your pharmacy partners? …”

• HealthRX

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “HealthRX states the tier and not the name. …”

• Henry Meds

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Henry’s terms distinguish the platform, clinician and pharmacy. They describe affiliated-pharmacy fulfillment and an option to use another pharmacy, where costs can differ. …”

• Hers

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The reviewed public offer does not identify the pharmacy assigned to an individual prescription. …”

• Hims

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The reviewed public offer does not identify the pharmacy assigned to an individual prescription. …”

• Hone Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Hone names the clinical half of its chain precisely and the pharmacy half not at all — but it does something with the pharmacy that nobody else in this category does. …”

• HumeCare+

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No compounding pharmacy is named anywhere on the site or in the terms, which describe only "licensed compounding pharmacies". …”

• Joi + Blokes

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on the sermorelin or VIP product pages. …”

• LifeMD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The reviewed public offer does not identify the pharmacy assigned to an individual prescription. …”

• Lighter You

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. …”

• Live Vital

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. …”

• Longevixx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on this site. …”

• LumiMeds

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. LumiMeds says treatments are prescribed “through state-licensed compounding pharmacies”, and its product pages now state the regulatory category outright — “SOURCE: 503A pharmacy · Compounded per your prescription · U. …”

• Luvo Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named and no compounding tier is stated, so nothing tells you whether your medication is made to order under your prescription or dispensed ready-made. …”

• Magnolia Regenerative Medicine

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. …”

• Maximus

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Maximus describes how it chooses pharmacies at length and never says which ones it chose. From the home page FAQ: "We select our pharmacy partners through an uncompromising vetting process designed to prioritize your safety and results. …”

• Mochi Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Mochi describes choosing among pharmacy partners and its published compounding discussion describes 503A pharmacies. …”

• MyDrHank

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. The lander says medication ships from licensed U.S. pharmacies and the product copy says accredited U. …”

• NEUVÉ Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere. What NEUVÉ says instead is a regulatory claim that does not exist: "Peptides compounded by 503A and 503B certified pharmacies. …”

• New Wave Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named, and no clinician either. …”

• Noom Med

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The reviewed pages do not identify the pharmacy assigned to an individual prescription. Obtain its name and contact details before relying on a medication offer.”

• Nova

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Nova does not name its pharmacy, but it does something most of this market avoids: it states the compounding category, and states it consistently. …”

• Prime Doctor RX

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. The Terms describe the arrangement at the level of a category — medication fulfillment may be handled by licensed pharmacies or other third-party fulfillment providers — and name nobody. …”

• Rehydra+ Wellness

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on Rehydra+ Wellness' website. …”

• Remedy Meds

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The cited public offer does not identify the dispensing pharmacy for a particular patient. …”

• Renlo Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named and no compounding tier is published — nothing on the site says whether the medication is made to order under a prescription or dispensed ready-made. …”

• RNK Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “RNK prints a pharmacy address in Springville, Utah, and a pharmacy phone number at the bottom of every page, but never the pharmacy's name. …”

• Ro

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The reviewed public offer does not identify the pharmacy assigned to an individual prescription. …”

• RX Bella

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. RX Bella's footer describes the arrangement at the level of a category — the platform "facilitates access to independent, U. …”

• RxSpan MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. The terms say only that medications may be fulfilled by licensed pharmacies if prescribed, and nothing states whether your medication would be made to order under your prescription or dispensed ready-made. …”

• Science & Co

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Science & Co names no pharmacy — but it does something rarer than naming one, which is to say what it is not. …”

• Sesame Care

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Sesame is a marketplace rather than a compounder, and states the arrangement plainly: "Sesame-affiliated provider practices are independently owned and operated by licensed clinicians who provide clinical services using the Sesame telehealth platform. …”

• SexyMD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. The clinical side is identified at the entity level — WizDoc LLC and Jonathan Larson, MD, P. …”

• Shed

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. …”

• SkinnyRx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. …”

• Strut Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on Strut's website. The language is consistently anonymous: "partner pharmacy", "pharmacy network", "U. …”

• Superior Remedies

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. Superior Remedies describes itself as "a concierge telehealth platform that facilitates access to independent, U. …”

• TrimRx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The offer identifies a state-licensed sterile compounding pharmacy but does not name the pharmacy assigned to an individual order. …”

• Try Ageless

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. Try Ageless states that its products are "compounded by state-licensed 503A pharmacies" and that "all medications sourced and dispensed from U. …”

• Valhalla Vitality

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Valhalla names the regulatory categories and not the pharmacy, which puts it slightly ahead of most of this market and still short of useful. …”

• VAULT Men's Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on the site, and the category asserted in its place is one the catalog cannot sit inside. …”

• VevaRX

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Nobody in the chain is named. Nowhere on the site does VevaRX mention 503A or 503B, the phrase "compounded by", a named, licensed prescriber, a "medical group" or a "doing business as" name. …”

• Vyvron

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Vyvron names the clinical side of its chain and none of the pharmacy side, and it is unusually direct about the distinction. …”

• WeightWatchers Clinic

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The reviewed pages do not identify the pharmacy assigned to an individual prescription. Obtain its name and contact details before relying on a medication offer.”

• Wellorithm

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named, no compounding tier is stated, and no clinician is identified anywhere on their site or across thirty screens of the quiz. …”

• Zealthy

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “The reviewed public offer does not identify the pharmacy assigned to an individual prescription. …”