The sellers that tell you which pharmacy actually fills your prescription

Every product counted here was graded against the published trials for that molecule, using the company's own words about it. The three counts below are that grading, and they are the ranking — there is no score, no weighting and no adjustment behind them.

The disclosure is what puts a company on this board; the counts beside it are its whole graded catalog, exactly as on the main board.

How a claim is graded, and what moves a compound between evidence tiers, is on our methodology page.

56 companies were inside this board's candidate net and did not meet its rule. Each one has a published review here, and none was left off for an unflattering result.

• AgelessRx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “For everything AgelessRx compounds, the pharmacy is never named. …”

• AHBARx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “AHBARx names three partners and none of them is presented accurately as its dispensing pharmacy. …”

• Alan Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. Alan says it supplies “U.S. …”

• Andrew Meds

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on the site, and no compounding class is stated — the copy says "compounded" throughout and never cites 503A or 503B. …”

• Believe Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere, and the census is dated rather than impressionistic: on 2026-09-01 the visible text and DOM of ten pages plus both production bundles were searched, returning zero occurrences of "503A", "503B" and "". …”

• Collective

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named, and no clinician, medical director or advisory name is published anywhere on the marketing site. …”

• CoreAge Rx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere a customer would look. …”

• Defy Medical

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Defy operates a page at /about-us/about-us-vendor-information/ headed "Defy Medical Vendor Information," with a section headed "Pharmacy. …”

• DudeMeds

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named for either side of the business. …”

• Eden

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No Eden product page names the pharmacy that compounded the prescription. …”

• Embody

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named, no compounding category is stated — neither 503A nor 503B appears — and, alone among the companies we track, the active ingredient is not named either. …”

• Enhance.MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. …”

• Eviora MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. …”

• Fella Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named, and no regulatory category — 503A or 503B — is stated on the public pages, re-checked 2026-08-26 across the homepage, /treatments, /about/states, /guarantee and the 27 screens of the walked quiz. …”

• Found

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named. …”

• Gala GLP-1

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. …”

• GOAL.MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. GOAL. …”

• Goldspan Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on either domain. Goldspan states a class and stops: "All therapies are dispensed by a pharmacy licensed under U. …”

• He & She MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on their site. The FAQ carries the question “Who are your pharmacy partners? …”

• HealthRX

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “HealthRX states the tier and not the name. …”

• Hone Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Hone names the clinical half of its chain precisely and the pharmacy half not at all — but it does something with the pharmacy that nobody else in this category does. …”

• HumeCare+

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No compounding pharmacy is named anywhere on the site or in the terms, which describe only "licensed compounding pharmacies". …”

• Idgie Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No individual pharmacy is named and no compounding tier is stated anywhere, so nothing tells you whether your medication is made to order under a prescription or dispensed ready-made. …”

• Joi + Blokes

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on the sermorelin or VIP product pages. …”

• Lighter You

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. …”

• Live Vital

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on livevital.io — checked across all 26 pages fetched. …”

• Longevixx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on this site, and the census that establishes it is dated rather than impressionistic. …”

• LumiMeds

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. LumiMeds says treatments are prescribed “through state-licensed compounding pharmacies”, and its product pages now state the regulatory category outright — “SOURCE: 503A pharmacy · Compounded per your prescription · U. …”

• Luvo Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named and no compounding tier is stated, so nothing tells you whether your medication is made to order under your prescription or dispensed ready-made. …”

• Magnolia Regenerative Medicine

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. …”

• Maximus

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Maximus describes how it chooses pharmacies at length and never says which ones it chose. From the home page FAQ: "We select our pharmacy partners through an uncompromising vetting process designed to prioritize your safety and results. …”

• MyDrHank

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. The lander says medication ships from licensed U.S. pharmacies and the product copy says accredited U. …”

• NEUVÉ Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere. What NEUVÉ says instead is a regulatory claim that does not exist: "Peptides compounded by 503A and 503B certified pharmacies. …”

• New Wave Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named, and no clinician either. …”

• Nova

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Nova does not name its pharmacy, but it does something most of this market avoids: it states the compounding category, and states it consistently. …”

• Prime Doctor RX

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. The Terms describe the arrangement at the level of a category — medication fulfillment may be handled by licensed pharmacies or other third-party fulfillment providers — and name nobody. …”

• Rehydra+ Wellness

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on rehydraplus.com. …”

• Renlo Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named and no compounding tier is published — nothing on the site says whether the medication is made to order under a prescription or dispensed ready-made. …”

• RX Bella

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. RX Bella's footer describes the arrangement at the level of a category — the platform "facilitates access to independent, U. …”

• RxSpan MD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. The terms say only that medications may be fulfilled by licensed pharmacies if prescribed, and nothing states whether your medication would be made to order under your prescription or dispensed ready-made. …”

• Science & Co

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Science & Co names no pharmacy — but it does something rarer than naming one, which is to say what it is not. …”

• Sesame Care

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Sesame is a marketplace rather than a compounder, and states the arrangement plainly: "Sesame-affiliated provider practices are independently owned and operated by licensed clinicians who provide clinical services using the Sesame telehealth platform. …”

• SexyMD

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. The clinical side is identified at the entity level — WizDoc LLC and Jonathan Larson, MD, P. …”

• Shed

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. …”

• SkinnyRx

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. …”

• Strut Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on struthealth.com — checked across all 132 pages of its site. …”

• Superior Remedies

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. Superior Remedies describes itself as "a concierge telehealth platform that facilitates access to independent, U. …”

• Trava Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named, and no regulatory category — 503A or 503B — is stated anywhere on the public pages. …”

• Try Ageless

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. Try Ageless states that its products are "compounded by state-licensed 503A pharmacies" and that "all medications sourced and dispensed from U. …”

• Valhalla Vitality

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Valhalla names the regulatory categories and not the pharmacy, which puts it slightly ahead of most of this market and still short of useful. …”

• VAULT Men's Health

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named anywhere on the site, and the category asserted in its place is one the catalog cannot sit inside. …”

• VevaRX

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Nobody in the chain is named. …”

• Vyvron

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “Vyvron names the clinical side of its chain and none of the pharmacy side, and it is unusually direct about the distinction. …”

• WellMedr

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No dispensing pharmacy is named anywhere on the site. The assurances offered are two phrases, and neither describes anything checkable. …”

• Wellorithm

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named, no compounding tier is stated, and no clinician is identified anywhere on their site or across thirty screens of the quiz. …”

• yourEra

  Names no dispensing pharmacy on its own site. What its review found: “No pharmacy is named. …”