Skip to content
Peptideworth
BreezeMeds

Provider review

BreezeMeds Review: Two of Its Four Products Have No Evidence Behind Them

BreezeMeds sells four things, and two of them have real trials behind them. Semaglutide and tirzepatide were tested in thousands of people, and whoever sells them, that evidence is real. Then there is the NAD+ and the sermorelin. Injected NAD+ has no completed trial. Sermorelin has nineteen, all from 1986 to 2005 and none about what these pages imply. BreezeMeds does not tell you which is which.

Correction, August 2026

This review previously said: “Sermorelin has no trial at all.”

That was wrong. The search behind it had been restricted to a paper's title and abstract, and the trial literature calls this molecule GHRH(1-29)-NH2 rather than sermorelin — so the restriction hid the trials rather than finding none. The three control molecules run alongside it were all findable by title and abstract, so they confirmed nothing.

It now says: PubMed's own filter returns 19 randomized controlled trials of sermorelin, published between 1986 and 2005, on growth-hormone stimulation and on growth in children with growth hormone deficiency. None of them measured skin, hair, muscle, fat loss or sleep — the outcomes it is actually sold for — and all 19 predate the 2007 rule that made trial registration mandatory, which is why the registry is empty.

If you are here for semaglutide or tirzepatide, the science is not the problem — and BreezeMeds is unusually open about who makes and prescribes your medication. If you are here for the NAD+ or the sermorelin, I could not find a completed human trial supporting what those pages suggest, and BreezeMeds says nothing either way. There is also no terms of service on the site at all, so nothing in writing tells you how to cancel.

Worth trusting if

  • You want semaglutide or tirzepatide — both have real phase 3 trials behind them, whoever sells them.
  • Knowing which pharmacy compounds your medication matters to you, because BreezeMeds names all four.
  • You want to check your prescriber yourself — both doctors are named and licensed.

Be skeptical if

  • You are buying the NAD+ or sermorelin for what the page implies, because no trial tests those uses.
  • You want the results BreezeMeds quotes, which come from trials of the branded drug rather than what it sells.
  • You need the terms in writing before starting — there is no terms of service on the site at all.
Dispenses

Compounded only

Evidence

Phase 3 trials

Pharmacy

Named

FDA letter

None found

By Grant Delaney, Research Editor

Disclosure: Some links on this site are affiliate or referral links. If you start a treatment or buy a product through them, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Read our full disclosure.

Visit BreezeMeds

Opens www.breezemeds.com. A link is not a recommendation to take anything.

Provenance

What BreezeMeds actually dispenses

Regulatory category is the axis consumers are most reliably misled about, so it comes first. Every product below is sorted by what it legally is, not by what it costs.

Compounded (503A)4 products

Prepared by a state-licensed pharmacy against a prescription for a named patient. Compounded preparations are not FDA-approved and are not reviewed by FDA for safety, effectiveness or quality.

  • NAD+ Injections — "Starting at $169", one of only two prices BreezeMeds prints on the page itself. A nasal form at $210 appears in the code and not on the page. No dose, supply length or billing interval is published for either.
  • Sermorelin — No price filed. The card says $100; the site's own code says $135. Those cannot both be right, and you won't see a price during signup until you've answered eleven health questions and handed over your date of birth.
  • Weight Loss Injections (compounded semaglutide) — "Starting at $199" — a floor, with no dose, supply length or billing interval published. You won't see a price during signup until you've answered eleven health questions and handed over your date of birth.
  • Compounded tirzepatide — No price filed. Advertised "Starting at $399"; the code carries $299 live with $399 struck through. The card quotes the crossed-out figure.

Evidence

Has the molecule been tested for what it is sold for?

One row per product, graded on how far the published human evidence goes for the MOLECULE inside it, for the use it is sold for — not for the molecule in general, and never a claim about this seller. Nobody trials a compounded preparation; what a trial can tell you is whether the molecule has been tested for the thing it is being advertised to do. A molecule with phase 3 evidence for one outcome has none for another, and that distinction is where peptide marketing lives.

NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) · compounded
No trial for this use
Sermorelin · compounded
No trial for this use
Semaglutide · compounded
Phase 3 trials
Tirzepatide · compounded
Phase 3 trials

2

Molecules with human evidence

For the use they are sold for, out of 4 products reviewed here. The evidence belongs to the molecule, not to BreezeMeds.

2

Registry records cited

Each read live from ClinicalTrials.gov, never from memory. None of them tested this company's product.

The comparison

What they claim, against what the trials show

Each claim below is quoted verbatim from BreezeMeds’s own page, with the page it came from. Grading a paraphrase would prove nothing. Every row is the verdict at a glance — tap it to open the quote, the trial registry entries, and the full note behind that verdict.

NAD+ InjectionsNAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) · Compounded (503A)No trial supports this claim
“Starting at $169 — NAD+ Injections. […] Affordable Pricing. Discreet Shipping. Licensed Providers. Certified Medication. Convenient. Confidential. 100% Online.”

Read on the BreezeMeds site, August 2026

No trial for this use

As of 10 August 2026, a ClinicalTrials.gov v2 intervention search for injected NAD+ in humans returns no completed randomized trial supporting a restoration-of-function claim, and a PubMed search for "nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide" combined with injection or subcutaneous, filtered to the randomized-controlled-trial publication type, returns zero records. The substantial human literature concerns ORAL precursors — nicotinamide riboside and nicotinamide mononucleotide — which are different molecules by a different route.

BreezeMeds publishes no description of NAD+ at all — no mechanism, no indication, no benefit, no contraindication, no side effect. It is a price and a button. There is therefore no efficacy sentence to hold against the literature, and no completed randomized human trial of injected NAD+ to hold one against. The only quality assertion attached is "Certified Medication", which names no certification and no certifying body. The nasal formulation is priced separately at $210 in the site's code but never surfaces on the page itself.1

SermorelinSermorelin · Compounded (503A)No trial supports this claim
“Sermorelin. […] Affordable Pricing. Licensed Providers. Certified Medication.”

Read on the BreezeMeds site, August 2026

No trial for this use

What the trials show for Sermorelin

As of 10 August 2026, a ClinicalTrials.gov v2 search returns NO interventional record naming sermorelin as the intervention, in any phase and at any status. Six different search terms were run — intervention "sermorelin", "sermorelin acetate", "GHRH(1-29)", "GHRH 1-29", "growth hormone releasing hormone 1-29" and "Geref", its withdrawn brand name — plus a free-text search of every field. The 27 studies returned are all different molecules: tesamorelin (TH9507/Egrifta), GHRH(1-44), or unspecified diagnostic "GHRH". PubMed is the opposite: searched WITHOUT restricting to title and abstract, its own filter returns 19 randomized controlled trials, published 1986-2005, on growth-hormone stimulation, dose-response pharmacology and comparisons against growth hormone in children with GH deficiency. Restricted to title and abstract the same query returns 0, because the trial literature names the molecule GHRH(1-29)-NH2 — a search that stops there misses all 19 trials. Every one of the 19 predates the 2007 rule that made registration mandatory, which is why the registry is empty. No trial measures any outcome this product is sold for. Re-verified 2026-08-12. The same searches do find other molecules — tirzepatide returned 158 registry records and 126 trial papers, tesamorelin 17 and 21, bremelanotide 10 and 11 — so an empty result for sermorelin means something.

No description is published, and no registered trial names the molecule — so there is neither a claim to check nor evidence to check it against. The price is worse than absent: BreezeMeds advertises sermorelin at $100 on its card while its own code carries $135. A figure the company's own checkout contradicts is not a price, and neither number is filed here. You can't find out what this costs without answering eleven health questions and handing over your date of birth.2,3

Weight Loss Injections (compounded semaglutide)Semaglutide · Compounded (503A)Claim reaches past the trials
“Starting at $199 — Weight Loss Injections. […] The Proven Way to lose 15% of your body weight fast! Lose 1-2lbs per week. […] Certified Medication.”

Read on the BreezeMeds site, August 2026

Phase 3 trials

What the trials show for Semaglutide

  • NCT03548935 STEP 1 — Phase 3, completed, n=1,961. Tested the approved 2.4 mg product over 68 weeks; about 14.9% weight loss from baseline against 2.4% on placebo. No compounded semaglutide from any seller has been through a registered trial.

The molecule works and every qualifier around it is wrong. "Proven" — BreezeMeds cites nothing anywhere on its site, and what it dispenses is a compounded preparation never tested in a registered trial. "15%" is STEP 1's figure, borrowed without attribution. "Fast" describes a result that took 68 weeks. "Lose 1-2lbs per week" is a rate claim with no source. And the site never uses the word "compounded" — zero occurrences across the public copy — while its own internal product identifiers read `compounded-semaglutide`. A reader is therefore never told that what they are buying is not the approved drug.4

Compounded tirzepatideTirzepatide · Compounded (503A)Claim reaches past the trials
“The Proven Way to lose 15% of your body weight fast! Lose 1-2lbs per week. […] Certified Medication.”

Read on the BreezeMeds site, August 2026

Phase 3 trials

What the trials show for Tirzepatide

  • NCT04184622 SURMOUNT-1 — Phase 3, completed, n=2,539. Tested the approved product at the highest tolerated dose over 72 weeks.

The site-wide headline covers tirzepatide too, and the 15% it quotes belongs to semaglutide's STEP 1 rather than to SURMOUNT-1, which reported roughly 20% over 72 weeks. The price is not filed, for a specific reason: the card advertises "Starting at $399" while the site's own code carries $299 as the live price with $399 as the STRUCK-THROUGH old one. The card is quoting the crossed-out number as the starting price — which is not merely inconsistent but inconsistent in the direction that makes the product look more expensive than it is, the opposite of the usual error.5

Dispensing chain

Who actually fills your prescription

Pharmacy named
  • Belmar Pharmacy
  • Strive Pharmacy
  • Epiq Scripts
  • Casa Pharma Rx
Read the full account

This is the one thing BreezeMeds does properly, and it does it well. Its homepage FAQ names four dispensing pharmacies with phone numbers and websites — "Belmar Pharmacy | Phone: 800-525-9473 | belmarpharmasolutions.com; Strive Pharmacy | Phone: 855-405-5993 | strivepharmacy.com; Epiq Scripts | Phone: 833-654-3553 | epiqscripts.com; Casa Pharma Rx | Phone: 877-937-6868 | casapharmarx.com" — and names two prescribing clinicians, Dr. Ana Lisa Carr MD and Dr. Kelly Tenbrink MD, both licensed, through Lion MD. Every one of those is checkable, and for a two-page website that is a genuinely useful disclosure. What is not disclosed is which of the four fills a given order. Belmar's own FDA letter of 31 March 2023 was CLOSED OUT on 30 October 2023, belongs to the pharmacy rather than to BreezeMeds, and is filed nowhere. BreezeMeds shares a backend with another brand in this wave — an identical live Stripe key, the same Supabase project, the same CareValidate endpoint and a word-for-word identical pharmacy FAQ block — with distinct organization IDs and seals. COMMON OWNERSHIP IS NOT PROVEN and is not asserted; a shared white-label platform is not grounds to treat the brands as duplicates, and naming the pharmacy remains a pro for both.

Read on the BreezeMeds site, August 2026.

Quality

Third-party testing, and what is published

—

Describes a testing regime

Nothing published on the pages searched

—

Certificate of analysis readable

No lot report a buyer can open

Read the full testing account

No certificate of analysis, lot number, potency result, sterility result, named laboratory or batch lookup is published for any product. The entire quality vocabulary is one phrase in a scrolling banner — "Certified Medication" — which names no certification, no standard and no certifying body. More striking is a word that never appears at all: "compounded" occurs ZERO times in BreezeMeds's public copy, while the site's own internal product identifiers read `compounded-semaglutide`. A reader is therefore never told that what they would receive is a compounded preparation rather than the approved drug — which is the single most important fact about it, and the specific omission FDA has issued warning letters to two other companies in this wave over. What BreezeMeds does publish, and what partly offsets this, is the identity and phone number of every pharmacy that might compound the medication, which at least gives a patient somebody to ask for a lot record. No study, trial identifier or publication is cited anywhere on the site.

Read on the BreezeMeds site, August 2026.

Licensing

Licensed to dispense, and where

Coverage

Not published — no state list, inclusion or exclusion, appears anywhere on the site

Read the full licensing claim

BreezeMeds publishes no coverage information of any kind. There is no state list, no map, no exclusion notice and no per-product restriction anywhere on the site. This review lists no excluded states, and that is because nothing has been disclosed — not because none exist. That is a consequence of a larger absence: THERE IS NO TERMS OF SERVICE. There is no terms page, no returns page and no pricing page — those addresses lead nowhere. A privacy policy does exist, embedded inline on the homepage. Nothing else does. The words "subscription", "recurring", "cancel", "auto-renew" and "refund" occur ZERO times each across the site, so a patient buying a repeating medication has no published statement of how to stop it, when they will be charged, or whether money can be returned. Clinical care is delivered by Lion MD through CareValidate, with two clinicians named and checkable in the federal registry. A consult fee of $80 applies only if a patient is approved and then declines to proceed, and that is disclosed up front — one of the few terms BreezeMeds does publish.

Read on the BreezeMeds site, August 2026.

Regulatory

The FDA warning letter

Checked, and none found

A search of the 113 warning letters issued to telehealth firms in the September 9, 2025, February 20, 2026 and June 8, 2026 enforcement waves — matched on full company name rather than substring, because a substring match attaches one company’s regulatory history to another — returns no entry for BreezeMeds. That is a statement about those three waves as of August 2026, not a claim that no action exists anywhere.

We did this ourselves

What happens when you sign up with BreezeMeds

We went through BreezeMeds’s signup ourselves in August 2026 to find out what you actually meet before you pay — the steps, when a price appears, and what it asks for. We used placeholder answers, and we stopped before paying, so nothing here is a prescription or a medical outcome. It is what the screens showed.

  1. Pick a tab on the homepage, Weight Loss or Wellness, where every card carries a from-price.
  2. Press Get Started, which opens a consultation form on the same site.
  3. Say what your weight loss goals are, from losing 1 to 20 pounds up to maintaining your weight.
  4. Say what you have tried before: exercise, dieting, supplements, intermittent fasting, or none of them.
  5. Give your height and weight, and watch it compute a BMI.
  6. Give your gender.
  7. Say whether you are already taking a GLP-1.
  8. Check any of the conditions it says may prevent a GLP-1 prescription.
  9. Check all current or past medical conditions from a second, longer list.
  10. Say whether you take any medications, prescription, over the counter or supplements.
  11. Type out any past surgeries, or N/A.
  12. List every allergy you have.
  13. Choose a consultation method: email and text, video call, or phone call.
  14. Give your date of birth.
  15. Give a first name, last name, email address and phone number, and attest that your answers are true and complete.
You see a price before you start
  • The prices sit on the homepage cards before any question is asked, split across two tabs, Weight Loss and Wellness, with a from-figure on every product.
  • No medication price appears inside the intake at all. Thirteen screens go by, and the only figure any of them shows is a consultation fee.
  • That fee arrives on the eleventh screen. Email and text is free; video or phone carries a fee that applies only if your prescription is approved and you then decide not to proceed.
  • That screen contradicts itself in a small way worth noticing: the heading says phone and video have a consultation fee, while the paragraph under it says the fee lands only if you are approved and walk away.
  • It ends by asking for your date of birth, then a phone number and an attestation that every answer is true and complete. We stopped at that attestation rather than sign invented answers over to a clinician.
  • BreezeMeds publishes no support phone number of its own. The four numbers on the site belong to the four pharmacies, and the only BreezeMeds address, support@breezemeds.com, appears inside the privacy policy rather than on a contact page.

BreezeMeds support

Assessment

What holds up, and what does not

What holds up
  • It names four dispensing pharmacies with phone numbers and websites — Belmar, Strive, Epiq Scripts and Casa Pharma Rx — which most of this category will not do.
  • Both prescribing doctors are named and licensed — Dr. Ana Lisa Carr and Dr. Kelly Tenbrink — and you can look them up in the federal NPPES registry.
  • The $80 consult fee, charged only if a patient is approved and then declines to proceed, is disclosed up front rather than discovered later.
Show 3 more
  • Two prices are visible right on the homepage, no intake needed — $199 for weight-loss injections and $169 for NAD+ — where several competitors show nothing at all.
  • A privacy policy is published in full, inline on the homepage.
  • No FDA warning letter for BreezeMeds.
What does not
  • There is no terms of service. None of the usual pages exist — no terms, no returns policy, no pricing page.
  • The words "subscription", "recurring", "cancel", "auto-renew" and "refund" appear zero times each on the site, so a repeating medication has no published cancellation or refund terms.
  • The word "compounded" never appears in public copy, while the site's own product identifiers read `compounded-semaglutide` — a buyer is never told they are not receiving the approved drug.
Show 9 more
  • Sermorelin is advertised at $100 while BreezeMeds's own code carries $135. Neither figure is filed here, because a price the company's own checkout contradicts is not a price.
  • Tirzepatide is advertised "Starting at $399" when $399 is the struck-through old price and $299 is the live one — the card quotes the crossed-out number.
  • You can't see a price during signup until you've answered eleven health questions and handed over your date of birth.
  • No description is published for any product: no mechanism, indication, benefit, contraindication or side effect for NAD+, sermorelin or the GLP-1s.
  • "The Proven Way to lose 15% of your body weight fast! Lose 1-2lbs per week" — nothing is cited, the 15% belongs to a 68-week trial of the approved product, and "fast" contradicts it.
  • No state coverage is published at all — no list, no map, no exclusions.
  • No certificate of analysis, lot number, laboratory or test result is published, and the only quality phrase is "Certified Medication", which names no certification.
  • Injected NAD+ at $169 has no completed randomized human trial behind it, and sermorelin's randomized trials all ran between 1986 and 2005, on pituitary function rather than on anything sold here.
  • The entire site is two pages, so almost everything you need is either behind the signup flow or nowhere.

Verdict

The bottom line

Get the cancellation terms in writing before you start, because the site has none — no terms of service, and the words subscription, recurring, cancel, auto-renew and refund appear zero times each. On the products: the semaglutide and tirzepatide evidence is real whoever sells it, and the NAD+ and sermorelin pages imply outcomes no completed trial has tested.

Visit BreezeMeds

Opens www.breezemeds.com. A link is not a recommendation to take anything.

What BreezeMeds does well, in full

It takes one paragraph, and it is worth stating first because it is real.

BreezeMeds's homepage FAQ names the pharmacies that might fill your prescription:

"Belmar Pharmacy | Phone: 800-525-9473 | belmarpharmasolutions.com · Strive Pharmacy | Phone: 855-405-5993 · Epiq Scripts | Phone: 833-654-3553 · Casa Pharma Rx | Phone: 877-937-6868"

It names two prescribing clinicians — Dr. Ana Lisa Carr MD and Dr. Kelly Tenbrink MD — both licensed, and anyone can verify them in the federal NPPES registry. And it discloses that an $80 consult fee applies if you are approved and then decline to proceed.

For a two-page website, that is a genuinely useful disclosure, and several much larger competitors in this wave do not match it.

Full analysis — 5 more sectionsAnd then there is nothing else · The prices its own code disagrees with · What is actually being sold · "The Proven Way to lose 15% of your body weight fast!" · What this means if you are buying

And then there is nothing else

BreezeMeds has no terms of service. There is no terms page, no privacy page, no pricing page and no products page — those addresses lead nowhere.

A privacy policy does exist — embedded inline on the homepage. Nothing else does.

Now count the words that never appear anywhere on the site:

WordOccurrences
subscription0
recurring0
cancel0
auto-renew0
refund0
compounded0

BreezeMeds sells a medication people take every week for months. It publishes no statement of when you will be charged, how to stop being charged, or whether money can ever come back.

That absence is different in kind. BreezeMeds's own internal product identifiers read `compounded-semaglutide`. The company knows exactly what it is dispensing. The public copy simply never says so — which means a reader is never told the single most important fact about the product: that it is not the approved drug, has no FDA approval, and has never been through a registered trial in the form they will receive.

Two other companies in this same review wave are under open FDA warning letters for blurring precisely that line. BreezeMeds does not blur it. It omits it.

The prices its own code disagrees with

Only two figures are printed on the homepage itself: "Starting at $199" for weight-loss injections and "Starting at $169" for NAD+. The other products only show anything once the page's scripts load.

Two of those prices do not match what the site's own checkout says.

Sermorelin is advertised at $100. The code carries $135.

Tirzepatide is advertised "Starting at $399". The code carries $299 as the live price, with $399 as the struck-through old price. The card is quoting the crossed-out number as the starting one.

That second error is unusual and worth dwelling on. Nearly every pricing defect in this review series runs in the seller's favor — a protocol total divided by too many months, an intro rate presented as standing, a starting dose presented as the price. This one runs the other way: BreezeMeds is advertising its tirzepatide as $100 dearer than its own system charges. It is not deceptive. It is a company that is not reading its own website.

Neither figure is filed as a price in this review. A number a company's own checkout contradicts is not a price, and picking whichever one is cheaper is exactly how a capture error ships.

Nor can you settle it yourself. You won't see a price during signup until you've cleared eleven clinical screens and handed over your date of birth. You cannot find out what treatment costs without first handing over your clinical history.

What is actually being sold

BreezeMeds publishes no description of any product. Not for NAD+, not for sermorelin, not for the GLP-1s. There is no mechanism, no indication, no benefit list, no contraindication, no side effect, no storage instruction. Each product is a name, sometimes a price, and a button.

The only quality claim on the site is a phrase in a scrolling banner: "Certified Medication". It names no certification, no standard and no certifying body.

So the evidence has to come from elsewhere.

Injected NAD+, at $169, has no completed randomized human trial supporting a restoration-of-function claim. 1 The substantial human literature concerns oral precursors — nicotinamide riboside and nicotinamide mononucleotide — different molecules taken a different way.

Sermorelin has a real randomized trial record. It is thirty years old and it is about something else. PubMed's own filter returns 19 randomized controlled trials, published between 1986 and 2005 3 — growth-hormone stimulation and dose-response pharmacology, and head-to-head comparisons against growth hormone in children with growth hormone deficiency 6. Not one of them concerns aging, muscle, fat loss or skin.

That record is easy to miss, and most searches do. The trial literature calls the molecule GHRH(1-29)-NH₂, not sermorelin, so a search restricted to titles and abstracts returns 24 records and zero trials — a true count of the wrong thing. ClinicalTrials.gov is separately empty: no interventional record names sermorelin. We searched it six different ways, including under Geref, its withdrawn US brand name, plus a free-text pass. The 27 studies that come back are other molecules. 2 The reason is chronology rather than neglect — every one of the 19 trials predates the 2007 rule that made registration mandatory.

Semaglutide and tirzepatide genuinely work, with large phase 3 programs behind the approved products. 4 5

"The Proven Way to lose 15% of your body weight fast!"

That headline sits on the BreezeMeds homepage, above "Lose 1-2lbs per week."

Proven — the site cites nothing. No trial, no PubMed ID, no study name, anywhere, for any product.

15% — that is STEP 1's figure, about 14.9% from baseline against 2.4% on placebo. It belongs to the approved 2.4 mg semaglutide product. BreezeMeds dispenses a compounded preparation, a word it never uses.

Fast — STEP 1 ran 68 weeks.

1-2lbs per week — no source.

What this means if you are buying

Use the pharmacy list. It is the best thing here: four named facilities with phone numbers, and two doctors you can look up. If you buy, ring the pharmacy and ask for the lot record, because BreezeMeds publishes no certificate of analysis for anything.

Before you buy, understand what you are agreeing to, because the site does not tell you. There is no terms of service. There is no published cancellation policy, no refund policy and no statement of billing interval. Ask, in writing, before you give a card.

Check the price against what you are actually charged. Two of the advertised figures disagree with the company's own system, and the tirzepatide one is $100 too high rather than too low.

And know that the product is compounded — because BreezeMeds will not use the word.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Does BreezeMeds have a terms of service?

No. There is no terms page at all — /terms, /privacy, /pricing and /products are all dead links. A privacy policy does exist, embedded inline on the homepage, and that is the only legal document published. The practical consequence is that the words "subscription", "recurring", "cancel", "auto-renew" and "refund" appear zero times each across the site. If you buy a medication you will take for months, BreezeMeds publishes no statement of when you are charged, how to stop being charged, or whether money can be returned.

What does BreezeMeds cost?

Two figures are visible without an intake: "Starting at $199" for weight-loss injections and "Starting at $169" for NAD+. Beyond that it gets unreliable. Sermorelin is advertised at $100 while BreezeMeds's own code carries $135. Tirzepatide is advertised "Starting at $399" when the code shows $299 as the live price and $399 as the struck-through old one — so the card is quoting the crossed-out number, which makes the product look $100 dearer than it is. Neither is filed as a price in this review, because a figure a company's own checkout contradicts is not a price. You also cannot settle it yourself before committing: you won't see a price during signup until you've answered eleven health questions and handed over your date of birth.

Which pharmacy will fill my BreezeMeds prescription?

One of four, and naming them is the best thing this company does. Its homepage FAQ lists Belmar Pharmacy (800-525-9473), Strive Pharmacy (855-405-5993), Epiq Scripts (833-654-3553) and Casa Pharma Rx (877-937-6868), each with a website, plus two named, licensed prescribing doctors — Dr. Ana Lisa Carr MD and Dr. Kelly Tenbrink MD — through Lion MD. All of that is checkable. What is not published is which of the four gets your order. Belmar's own FDA warning letter of March 2023 was closed out in October 2023, belongs to the pharmacy rather than to BreezeMeds, and is not filed against this company.

Does BreezeMeds say its medication is compounded?

No — the word appears zero times in its public copy, which is remarkable given that the site's own internal product identifiers read `compounded-semaglutide`. The company knows what it dispenses; the pages never say. That matters more than it sounds, because a compounded preparation is not FDA-approved, is not reviewed by FDA for safety, effectiveness or quality, and has never been through a registered trial in the form a patient receives. Two other companies in this same review wave are under open FDA warning letters for implying their compounded products carry an approved drug's standing. BreezeMeds does not imply it either way; it simply never raises the subject.

Is there evidence for BreezeMeds's NAD+ or sermorelin?

For neither, and BreezeMeds makes no claim about either — it publishes no description of any product, so there is no mechanism, indication or benefit stated anywhere. On the underlying molecules: injected NAD+ has no completed randomized human trial supporting a restoration-of-function claim, and the substantial human literature concerns oral precursors, which are different molecules by a different route. Sermorelin is different: PubMed holds 19 randomized controlled trials for it, published between 1986 and 2005 under the name GHRH(1-29)-NH2, on pituitary function rather than on aging, muscle or skin. No registered study names sermorelin as the intervention, because all 19 predate mandatory trial registration. The only quality phrase on the site is "Certified Medication", which names no certification and no certifying body.

Is BreezeMeds the same company as Synergy Rx?

Not proven, and this review does not assert it. What is established is a shared technical backend: an identical live Stripe key, the same Supabase project, the same CareValidate endpoint, the same Lion MD clinicians, and a word-for-word identical four-pharmacy FAQ block — with distinct organization IDs and distinct seals. That pattern is consistent with several brands running on one white-label telehealth platform, which is common in this category and is not by itself evidence of common ownership. It is also not a reason to treat the brands as duplicates or to discount either one's disclosure: naming four pharmacies with phone numbers is a genuine pro wherever it appears.

Glossary

Key terms

Show definitions
Compounded preparation
A medicine mixed by a pharmacy for a named patient rather than manufactured and approved as a finished product. Compounded preparations are not FDA-approved and are not reviewed by FDA for safety, effectiveness or quality. BreezeMeds never uses the word, though its own product identifiers do.
Struck-through price
An old or reference price displayed crossed out beside a lower current one. BreezeMeds's tirzepatide card advertises the struck-through figure ($399) as the starting price, when its code carries $299 as the live one.
Sermorelin
A synthetic fragment of growth hormone-releasing hormone, GHRH(1-29). Once approved in the US as Geref; that approval has been withdrawn, and no current ClinicalTrials.gov record names sermorelin as an intervention.
Hydration
The moment a JavaScript app fills in content the server did not send. BreezeMeds prints two prices on the page itself; the rest of its products fill in afterwards, which is why what is displayed and the underlying code can disagree.

Compare

Others selling what BreezeMeds sells

Companies we have also reviewed that dispense at least one of the same compounds, ordered by how much of what they say about their products matches the trials behind them. Nothing here is a recommendation, and none of these links earns us anything.

Method

How we checked this

Non-product facts last checked August 2026. Read the editorial policy for the rules this page is held to.

Read our methodology

Claims read first-party

Every quoted claim was read off BreezeMeds's own pages, first-hand, on the date stamped against it — never from a summary, an aggregator, or an earlier version of this review.

Trials read from the registry

Phase, status and enrollment come from ClinicalTrials.gov; identifiers and journals from PubMed's own records. Nothing here is cited from memory.

Absence claims bounded

Where we report that no trial exists, the page says what was searched, where, and when — never an unbounded claim that nobody has tested something.

Letters matched on full name

FDA letters are matched on the complete company name. A substring match would attach one firm's regulatory history to another with a similar name.

Sources

References

Show all 6 sources
  1. US National Library of Medicine (2026). ClinicalTrials.gov v2 and PubMed searches for injected NAD+ in humans: no completed randomised trial supporting a restoration-of-function claim; zero randomised-controlled-trial publications for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide combined with injection or subcutaneous administration. Run 2026-08-10.. ClinicalTrials.gov / PubMed. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?intr=NAD%2B
  2. US National Library of Medicine (2026). ClinicalTrials.gov v2 search: no interventional record names sermorelin as the intervention. Six search terms run — "sermorelin", "sermorelin acetate", "GHRH(1-29)", "GHRH 1-29", "growth hormone releasing hormone 1-29", "Geref" — plus a free-text pass. The same pass found tirzepatide 158 records, tesamorelin 17, bremelanotide 10, confirming the search itself was working. Run 2026-08-10.. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?intr=sermorelin
  3. US National Library of Medicine (2026). PubMed search: sermorelin AND randomized controlled trial[pt] returns 19 records, published 1986-2005. Restricting the same query to title and abstract returns 0, because the trial literature names the molecule GHRH(1-29)-NH2 rather than sermorelin. Re-run 2026-08-12 with a fabricated-molecule negative control returning 0.. PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=sermorelin+AND+randomized+controlled+trial%5Bpt%5D
  4. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. (2021). Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. New England Journal of Medicine 384(11):989-1002. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33567185/
  5. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. (2022). Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity. New England Journal of Medicine 387(3):205-216. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35658024/
  6. Chen RG, Shen YN, Yei J, Wang CF, Xie DH (1993). A comparative study of growth hormone (GH) and GH-releasing hormone(1-29)-NH2 for stimulation of growth in children with GH deficiency.. Acta Paediatrica Supplement 388:32-35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8329830/

Medical disclaimer: This content is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any treatment.