The sellers that name the states they cannot reach

Every product counted here was graded against the published trials for that molecule, using the company's own words about it. The three counts below are that grading, and they are the ranking — there is no score, no weighting and no adjustment behind them.

The named exclusion is what puts a company on this board; the counts beside it are its whole graded catalog, so the ranking still turns on claim accuracy.

How a claim is graded, and what moves a compound between evidence tiers, is on our methodology page.

78 companies were inside this board's candidate net and did not meet its rule. Each one has a published review here, and none was left off for an unflattering result.

• 1st Optimal

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Licensed providers in all 50 states, per the provider's own statement; not independently verified”.

• AHBARx

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “AHBARx says in its footer, terms and privacy policy that "services are available only to patients physically located within all 50 states of the United States", and its checkout state selector enumerates 51 entries — the 50 states plus the District of Columbia. Its privacy policy pulls the other way, saying the service "may only be used within certain states within the United States as described in our Terms and Conditions", and the terms name no state at all.”.

• Alan Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “No state list or set of exclusions is published on the public pages. Delivery is stated as three days or less from its pharmacy partners, without naming the jurisdictions served.”.

• Alinwell

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Alinwell's FAQ says service is available across all 50 states and its homepage marquee says telehealth nationwide. The intake's own shipping-state selector offers 51 options, adding the District of Columbia. No enumerated list appears in the company's prose anywhere, so the selector is the widest verified statement rather than the badge.”.

• Andrew Meds

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Andrew Meds publishes both halves of its footprint, which is rare: asynchronous questionnaire care in 44 named states, and seven jurisdictions where a live consultation is required first — the District of Columbia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Rhode Island and West Virginia. The two lists add to 51 and reconcile against each other. Its own intake then offers 50 states and does not include the District of Columbia, so a reader in the one jurisdiction it singles out cannot start.”.

• Auren Rx

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 US states, by Auren Rx's own statement, with formulation-level caveats”.

• Believe Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Believe Health makes four different statements about its footprint and publishes no list. Its homepage badges "50-STATE CARE" and a counter reading "50 STATES COVERED"; its about page says "50 STATES SERVED". Its own FAQ answers the question circularly — "Believe Health operates via telehealth across the states where we operate." No exclusion list appears anywhere, and the intake's state selector is the only enumerable set at 51 entries.”.

• Belle Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Re-checked 2026-08-25 by walking the signup: the state question inside it says "We currently ship to all 50 U.S. states" and its dropdown lists all fifty plus the District of Columbia, with nothing excluded. That is an answer, and it only appears inside the signup — the public pages still enumerate nothing.”.

• Bliv

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “No state list or set of exclusions is published. The intake opens with a state selector — "Select the state you live in… we will deliver your medication to if prescribed" — so eligibility is settled inside the flow rather than on any page a reader can check first.”.

• Bodybuilding Health+

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Bodybuilding Health+ says it serves patients in all fifty states, adding that availability of specific services may vary by state based on provider licensure and applicable regulations. That answer sits inside a collapsed panel on the homepage rather than on the page itself, read on September 13, 2026.”.

• BreezeMeds

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not published — no state list, inclusion or exclusion, appears anywhere on the site”.

• CareBareRX

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Nationwide, with named no-ship states on specific non-GLP-1 products”.

• Clume Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “"Clume Health currently offers services in all 50 states plus Washington D.C. Some services may not be available in all 50 states or Washington D.C. Subject to change." No per-state list is published and no page says which services are limited where, so the qualifier cannot be acted on by a reader deciding whether their state is covered.”.

• Collective

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “No per-state list is published on the marketing site.”.

• CoreAge Rx

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not published — no state list, inclusion or exclusion, appears anywhere on the site”.

• Defy Medical

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not published — no state count, list or checker appears anywhere on the site”.

• DudeMeds

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “DudeMeds says no face-to-face visit is required "in most states", which is its own hedge and the closest thing to a coverage statement on the site. It publishes no state list and no exclusions on the weight-loss pages, the catalog or the legal section. The TRT route does require a video visit with a doctor licensed in your state, so availability there depends on where you live. Checked September 13, 2026.”.

• Edessa

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Edessa publishes no list of states and claims no nationwide coverage. Its terms give a Las Vegas business address and no service area, checked across the homepage, the three product pages and the terms on September 13, 2026.”.

• Embody

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not published — no state list, inclusion or exclusion, appears anywhere on the site”.

• Eviora MD

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Eviora MD says telehealth nationwide on its treatment pages and publishes no list of states, no exclusions and no fifty-state claim, checked on September 13, 2026 across the homepage, the three treatment pages, the terms and the full signup. The signup never asks which state you are in — it asks for a full shipping address instead, at screen twenty-five.”.

• Fella Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “No coverage list is published. Twenty states have their own landing page at /about/states — California, Texas, Florida, New York, Washington, Arizona, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Colorado, Indiana, Virginia and Georgia. That is a marketing index, not a statement of where Fella will prescribe: the page never says those twenty are the only ones, and this review does not read it as one. The quiz asks "What state will your medication be shipped to?" on its eighth screen and offers a free-text state field, which is where eligibility is actually settled.”.

• Found

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not published — no state list appears anywhere; Found warns only that prescriptions are "not available in all states"”.

• Gala GLP-1

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “"Licensed providers in all 50 states", with no exclusion list published”.

• GOAL.MD

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “48 states, as a count rather than a list. The homepage FAQ answers "Which states are eligible for GLP-1 treatment programs?" with: "We currently serve patients in 48 states across the US. Our telehealth platform allows you to receive care from licensed physicians no matter where you're located. Contact us to confirm availability in your specific state." That answer sits behind a closed accordion and had to be clicked open to read. Forty-eight means two are excluded, and neither the forty-eight nor the two is named — so this review names no excluded states, because naming them would mean inventing them, not because none exist. A "Medicare GLP-1 Bridge" is advertised for eligible members without enumerating jurisdictions.”.

• Goldspan Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “goldspanhealth.com says "IN 50 STATES" and "AVAILABLE IN 50 STATES", and the storefront says "Available in all 50 states and Washington, D.C." Its own Terms §3 then says "Some therapies are unavailable in certain states or based on medical history", and no page publishes a list of which therapies or which states. Both statements can be true at once — the service reaches everywhere, individual products may not — and a buyer has no way to find out which applies to the product they are about to order.”.

• He & She MD

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “The site says it ships nationwide and answers “What states do you ship to?” in its FAQ without publishing a list or a set of exclusions. No state-by-state page or list of jurisdictions is published anywhere on their site, so the coverage claim cannot be checked against anything.”.

• HealthRX

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “HealthRX publishes no list of states and makes no fifty-state claim, checked on September 13, 2026 across the homepage, the pricing page and the terms. Its terms resolve disputes under California law, which says where it would argue rather than where it will ship.”.

• Hone Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not published. Across 107 pages, Hone names no state, no count and no exclusion for its clinical service”.

• Idgie Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Idgie Health publishes no list of states and claims no nationwide coverage, on its product pages, its terms or its shipping policy, checked on September 13, 2026. Its terms route coverage through the independent doctors who write the prescriptions rather than stating a service area.”.

• Invigor Medical

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “50 states, by Invigor's own home-page claim”.

• Lean Meds

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “No per-state list is published on the marketing site.”.

• Lighter You

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not disclosed. Lighter You states only that it is "[n]ot available in all 50 states" and names no state anywhere”.

• Live Vital

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 states by its marketing, Utah plus 'where permitted' by its terms”.

• Longevixx

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Longevixx says three ways on its marketing pages that it covers 50 states — a homepage ticker, a stat block and a badge strip — and its intake's shipping selector offers 51 options once the District of Columbia is counted. Its own contact page says something narrower: "Longevixx operates via telehealth in the states where it is licensed", and a treatment FAQ repeats it as "across the states where we're available". No exclusion list is published either way.”.

• LumiMeds

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Re-checked 2026-08-26: no state list or exclusion set is published as such, but two things now point at nationwide coverage. Its medical director is described as “Licensed in all 50 states”, and the state question inside the assessment lists all fifty with none excluded. Neither is a coverage statement, so none is asserted here.”.

• Luvo Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Luvo publishes no list of states, no included set and no exclusions, checked on September 13, 2026 across the weight-loss and longevity program pages and the pricing blocks on each. Nothing on the site tells you whether your own state is served before you begin.”.

• Magnolia Regenerative Medicine

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “"We provide telemedicine care in the following 26 states (including Washington D.C.)": Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. Louisiana is not on that list, which is worth noticing because both of the company's clinics are in Louisiana and the site directs Louisiana readers to an in-person visit instead.”.

• Marek Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 states for the Guided Optimization® program, per the provider's own FAQ; treatment-level exclusions exist but are published on no reachable page”.

• MEDGm

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “MEDGm advertises the service as "100% Online — from consult to delivery", and notes separately that telemedicine regulations vary by state and that some states require a live video or telephone consultation before prescribing. No per-state list is published, so a reader cannot tell in advance which applies to them.”.

• Mondae

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Mondae says it is available in all 50 states, and its intake's shipping selector offers 51 options once the District of Columbia is counted. Its shipping policy narrows that in a practical way worth knowing: it does not ship to P.O. boxes, to APO or FPO addresses, or internationally. No state is excluded by name anywhere.”.

• MyDrHank

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “MyDrHank publishes no list of states and makes no fifty-state claim, checked on September 13, 2026 across the lander, the intake and the terms. What it does say is that its physicians are U.S.-licensed and the program runs entirely online with no office visits.”.

• NEUVÉ Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “NEUVÉ says it serves all 50 states with clinicians licensed in your state of residence, and its quiz's state map is consistent — enumerated live, it offers 51 selections covering every state plus Washington, D.C. The same homepage also prints "Members in 40+ states" twice; its About page separates the two properly as "50 states reviewed" against "40+ states with members", but the homepage runs them side by side. Its Financial Policy then refers to an "Arizona-licensed clinician", which is narrower than anything else on the site.”.

• New Wave Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “New Wave Health publishes no list of states and makes no fifty-state claim, checked on September 13, 2026 across the homepage, the three treatment pages, the terms and the full signup. The signup never asks which state you are in; it asks for a full shipping address instead, at screen twenty-five.”.

• No BS RX

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “No BS RX publishes no list of states and claims no nationwide coverage. Its pricing page says only that prices depend on provider review and state availability, which admits coverage varies without saying how. Checked across the homepage, the pricing page, the FAQ and the terms on September 13, 2026.”.

• NovoCare Pharmacy

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 US states and territories, per Novo Nordisk's own program terms”.

• Oak Longevity

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 states and the District of Columbia, with no state requiring a synchronous visit”.

• Oria Meds

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “The homepage badge row says "Licensed providers in all 50 states". No per-state list is published, and the NAD+ page adds that eligibility includes "patients residing in a state where telehealth services are available", without saying which states those are.”.

• Pallas Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 states and Washington, D.C., with a synchronous video visit required in 7 states plus D.C.”.

• Peak Wellness

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Re-checked 2026-08-26: it does answer this, and this review previously said it did not. The FAQ reads "Peak Wellness serves patients in all 50 states. Our telehealth services and partner pharmacy network are available nationwide," and the state question inside the signup lists all fifty with none excluded.”.

• Polly (formerly Piper)

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Re-checked 2026-08-26: it now answers this, and this review previously said it did not. "Polly facilitates access to independent licensed providers and partner pharmacies available in all 50 U.S. states. We connect you with healthcare professionals and pharmacies that are fully licensed to practice and dispense in your specific state." No exclusions are named.”.

• Prime Doctor RX

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Prime Doctor RX publishes no list of states and claims no nationwide coverage. Its Terms say only that telehealth care generally depends on where you are physically located when care is provided, which describes how the law works rather than where this company operates. Checked across the homepage, the Terms and the privacy policy on September 13, 2026.”.

• Rehydra+ Wellness

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “20 states, which Rehydra+ does not name”.

• Renlo Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Renlo publishes no list of states and claims no nationwide coverage, on its homepage, its product pages or its FAQ, checked on September 13, 2026. Coverage is decided at the free assessment, which is where the site sends every eligibility question.”.

• RX Bella

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “RX Bella says telehealth nationwide on its treatment pages and publishes no list of states, no exclusions and no fifty-state claim, checked on September 13, 2026 across the homepage, the three treatment pages and the terms.”.

• Rx.com

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Rx.com says it has licensed providers in all 50 states, printed in the bar at the top of every page and checked on September 13, 2026. That is a claim about where its clinicians can practice rather than a promise to ship compounded medication to any particular address, and no state list appears anywhere on the site.”.

• RxSpan MD

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “RxSpan MD publishes no list of states and makes no nationwide claim, checked on September 13, 2026 across the homepage, the products page, the about page and the terms. Its terms require that you be in the same state as your shipping address at the time of a consultation, which describes how telehealth works rather than where this company operates.”.

• Science & Co

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Science & Co publishes no list of states and claims no nationwide coverage, on its product pages, its FAQ or its terms, checked on September 13, 2026. Its terms govern use of the website rather than describing a service area.”.

• Sesame Care

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Sesame publishes no state list, included set or excluded set for its weight-loss service on the surfaces reachable without an account, so there was nothing we could check ourselves, and no coverage is claimed below.”.

• SexyMD

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “The footer block, identical on all eleven pages, says both that the service "is available in all 50 states" and that services are "currently available in all states except Arkansas, Mississippi" and others. Those two sentences are in the same block, and a reader in an excluded state has no way to tell which governs.”.

• Shed

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico”.

• SkinnyRx

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not published — no state list, inclusion or exclusion, appears on the site”.

• Solaya MD

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “"Solaya MD currently serves patients in all 50 U.S. states through affiliated medical providers and licensed pharmacy partners", and unlike most sites making that claim, this one publishes the full enumerated list of fifty to back it.”.

• Sprout Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Sprout publishes no list of states on its homepage or its terms, checked September 13, 2026. The sister site's August 2026 read found a contradiction worth carrying: the terms named 44 states and excluded California, where the company's own registered office is, while marketing elsewhere implied wider coverage. Confirm your own state before ordering rather than relying on either.”.

• Superior Remedies

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Re-checked 2026-08-25, and there is now a set to test the claim against — it disagrees with the claim. The badge strip says "TELEHEALTH IN ALL 50 STATES", the FAQ answer to "What states is this service available in?" says "Service is available across all 50 states", and the shipping-state dropdown inside the quiz lists all fifty plus the District of Columbia. The contact page says something else: "Superior Remedies operates telehealth across CA, IL, MI, NY, UT, VA, and WI." That is seven states. Both sentences are the company's own, published on the same site on the same day, and we cannot tell you which one is right. Ask before you pay if you live outside those seven.”.

• Synergy Rx

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “"All 50 U.S. states" by the FAQ; "certain states" by the Terms, with no list published”.

• telos rx

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 states claimed, with formulation availability varying by state and disclosed as doing so”.

• The Edit Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 US states, by The Edit's own statement”.

• TOM Weight Loss

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Texas and Utah, and nowhere else. TOM publishes this on every page — "Serving Texas & Utah" in the footer, "Available to patients located in Texas and Utah only" in the legal block, "Licensed in TX & UT" on the homepage — and gives it a page of its own at /areas-we-serve. Its eligibility page adds the clinical criteria in full: a BMI of 30 or higher, or 27 or higher with a weight-related condition, plus being at least 18 and physically located in Texas or Utah.”.

• Transcend

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 states and the District of Columbia, per the provider's own FAQ; 18+, or 21+ for some services”.

• Trava Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “No state list or set of exclusions is published on the public pages, re-checked 2026-08-26.”.

• Trimi

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 states and Washington, D.C.”.

• Try Ageless

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “No state list is published. Try Ageless says its clinicians are U.S.-licensed and describes review as "same-day in most states", but publishes no included set and no excluded set anywhere on its weight-loss pages, so there was nothing for us to check ourselves and no coverage is claimed below.”.

• Valhalla Vitality

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not published. No state, count or exclusion appears anywhere across the 113 non-blog pages”.

• VAULT Men's Health

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “All 50 states, claimed; no clinician named and no license number published anywhere on the site”.

• VevaRX

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “The FAQ enumerates 36 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. The Terms say twice that products are available across "the 50 U.S. states". Both statements are on the live site and they cannot both be right; the enumerated list is the more specific one, and it is fourteen states shorter.”.

• WellMedr

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Not published — WellMedr declines to answer the question and defers it to the sign-up flow”.

• Wellorithm

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “Wellorithm publishes no list of states and makes no nationwide claim, checked on September 13, 2026 across the campaign page and thirty screens of the quiz. The quiz never asks which state you are in.”.

• yourEra

  Names no state it will not serve. Its licensing statement reads: “yourEra publishes no list of states. Its terms require that you be physically located in the same state as the shipping address on your account at the time of a consultation, which describes how telehealth law works rather than where this company operates. Checked September 13, 2026.”.