Ranked board
NAD+ sellers, and what a human trial has actually tested
NAD+ is the most-stocked product on this site after semaglutide, and it is sold for energy, focus, cellular repair and ageing itself. The injectable NAD+ literature in healthy adults is thin enough that most of those claims have nothing behind them at all. Every form is counted — injection, nasal spray, cream — because the claim is about the molecule, not the syringe.
Disclosure: Some links on this site are affiliate or referral links. If you start a treatment or buy a product through them, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Read our full disclosure.
What gets on this board
Every published review whose dispensed list includes a product we have graded as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, in any route of administration. Precursors sold as supplements are a different product and are not on this board.
What decides the order
Ranked by how much of what each company sells is described accurately — the share of the products this board counts whose marketing claim matches the trials behind it. Ties go to the company with more matching claims, then to the one that names its pharmacy, then to the one that publishes a testing regime, and last of all to alphabetical order. Nothing is pinned, sponsored, or lifted into position.
What the grading found
0/13
Claims that match the trials
Across every one of these companies' NAD+ products that we have graded.
5/13
Name their pharmacy
A telehealth brand is almost never the pharmacy that fills the order.
0
Publish a readable certificate
Of every company reviewed on this site, not just those on this board.
The ranking
Every product counted here was graded against the published trials for that molecule, using the company's own words about it. The three counts below are that grading, and they are the ranking — there is no score, no weighting and no adjustment behind them.
Only NAD+ products are counted here, in whichever form the company sells them. One company on this board sells NAD+ solely as a nasal spray, which is why the slug does not say “injection”.
| Company | Claims vs. trials | Discloses | Visit |
|---|---|---|---|
Invigor Medical Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit |
PeptidesRx Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Not linked |
The Edit Health Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit |
Trellis Vitality Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit |
Auren Rx Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Pharmacy named | Visit |
AgelessRx Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Testing shown | Visit |
0/10%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
Valhalla Vitality Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Testing shown | Visit |
Hone Health Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Nothing published | Visit |
0/10%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
Lighter You Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Nothing published | Visit |
Rehydra+ Wellness Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Nothing published | Visit |
Vyvron Checked August 2026 | 0/10%
| Nothing published | Visit |
How a claim is graded, and what moves a compound between evidence tiers, is on our methodology page.
What this board does not measure
Whether it works
A company can describe a weakly-evidenced product accurately and rank well here. What the evidence says about each molecule is on its own graded compound page, and the two questions are deliberately kept apart.
Clinical care
We read public pages. We have not been a patient of any of these companies, have not assessed a consultation, and publish no quality score of any kind.
Price
Prices appear on a review as a note where a company publishes one, and they are not part of this ranking. A cheaper company is not lower here and a dearer one is not higher.
Product quality
Not one company reviewed here publishes a certificate of analysis a customer can read. Until that changes, nothing on this site can tell you what is in a vial.
Frequently asked questions
Does the route of administration change the verdict?
It changes what would be needed to support a claim, and it is one of the reasons so many of these come back unsupported. A nasal spray and a subcutaneous injection of the same molecule are different exposures, and a trial of one is not evidence for the other. Where a company sells NAD+ in a form no trial has used, the claim about that form has nothing behind it however the molecule performs elsewhere.
Is NAD+ the same as NMN or NR?
No. NMN and NR are precursors the body converts, sold as oral supplements, with their own separate and also limited trial record. This board is about NAD+ itself as a prescribed compounded preparation. A claim carried over from a precursor trial to an NAD+ injection is exactly the kind of transfer we grade as unsupported.
Nothing pinned
Medical disclaimer: This content is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any treatment.