Ranked board
Peptide sellers, ranked by whether their claims match the trials
Compare 106 providers by how their product claims match published research. This is a comparison of evidence and disclosure, not a clinical recommendation. A trial on an ingredient does not establish that a seller’s formulation works the same way; review the population, route and pharmacy details before deciding.
There is no quality score here and no star rating. What there is, is a count: for each company, how many of the things it says about the products it sells are supported by the trials behind them, how many reach past those trials, and how many have no trial behind them at all. That count is the ranking.
Disclosure: Some links on this site are affiliate or referral links. If you start a treatment or buy a product through them, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Read our full disclosure.
What gets on this board
Every company with a published review here whose product assessment is not limited to selected products. Reviews of selected products remain available but are not ranked as whole-catalog assessments. No company is excluded for an unflattering result — a poor score is a finding, not a reason to drop a row.
What decides the order
Companies we have a paid relationship with are listed first, and we say so here rather than marking individual rows. Within that group and within the rest, the order is the same measured one: how much of what each company sells is described accurately — the share of the products this board counts whose marketing claim matches the trials behind it. Ties go to the company with more matching claims, then to the one that names its pharmacy, then to the one that publishes a testing regime, and last of all to alphabetical order. Being a partner changes where a company sits, never what its numbers say.
What the grading found
113/382
Claims that match the trials
Across every one of these companies' graded products that we have graded.
43/106
Name their pharmacy
A telehealth brand is almost never the pharmacy that fills the order.
0
Publish a readable certificate
Of every company reviewed on this site, not just those on this board.
The ranking
Every product counted here was graded against the published trials for that molecule, using the company's own words about it. The three counts below are that grading, and they are the ranking — there is no score, no weighting and no adjustment behind them.
Each product evaluated in the review is counted here, whatever the molecule. Reviews explicitly limited to selected products are excluded from this broad comparison. The molecule-specific boards count a subset of the same grading.
| Company | Claims vs. trials | Discloses | Visit |
|---|---|---|---|
3/3100%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
3/3100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/2100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/2100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
4/667%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/367%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
3/650%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
3/650%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
2/450%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/250%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
1/250%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/633%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/333%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
1/333%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/729%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/425%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit | |
1/617%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/40%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit | |
0/20%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/20%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/30%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/20%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/60%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/30%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
0/20%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/30%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/40%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/60%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/20%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
4/4100%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
4/4100%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
3/3100%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
3/3100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/2100%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
2/2100%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
2/2100%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
2/2100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/2100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/2100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/2100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/1100%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
3/475%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
2/367%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
3/650%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit | |
2/450%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
4/1040%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
2/540%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit | |
2/540%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
2/540%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
2/633%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
1/333%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
1/333%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/425%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit | |
1/425%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
1/425%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/425%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/520%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/520%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/520%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/520%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/617%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
1/617%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
1/617%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
2/1414%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
1/813%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/50%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit | |
0/100%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Not linked | |
0/60%
| Pharmacy namedTesting shown | Visit | |
0/10%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/40%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/30%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/30%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/20%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/10%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/40%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/20%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/10%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/30%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/110%
| Pharmacy named | Visit | |
0/10%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
0/40%
| Testing shown | Visit | |
0/50%
| Testing shown | Not linked | |
0/30%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/30%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/60%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/40%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/70%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/20%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/30%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/10%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/30%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/20%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/30%
| Nothing published | Visit | |
0/10%
| Nothing published | Visit |
How a claim is graded, and what moves a compound between evidence tiers, is on our methodology page.
What this board does not measure
Whether it works
A company can describe a weakly-evidenced product accurately and rank well here. What the evidence says about each molecule is on its own graded compound page, and the two questions are deliberately kept apart.
Clinical care
We read public pages. We have not been a patient of any of these companies, have not assessed a consultation, and publish no quality score of any kind.
Price
Prices appear on a review as a note where a company publishes one, and they are not part of this ranking. A cheaper company is not lower here and a dearer one is not higher.
Product quality
Not one company reviewed here publishes a certificate of analysis a customer can read. Until that changes, nothing on this site can tell you what is in a vial.
Considered, and not on this board
5 companies were inside this board's candidate net and did not meet its rule. Each one has a published review here, and none was left off for an unflattering result.
- Belle Health
Belle Health has a review of selected products, not a whole-catalog claim assessment. It is not ranked on this broad board.
- EverPrime
EverPrime has a review of selected products, not a whole-catalog claim assessment. It is not ranked on this broad board.
- Ivim Health
Ivim Health has a review of selected products, not a whole-catalog claim assessment. It is not ranked on this broad board.
- Noom Med
Noom Med has a review of selected products, not a whole-catalog claim assessment. It is not ranked on this broad board.
- WeightWatchers Clinic
WeightWatchers Clinic has a review of selected products, not a whole-catalog claim assessment. It is not ranked on this broad board.
Frequently asked questions
What does “claim matches the trials” actually mean?
For each product evaluated in the review, we take the company’s own words about what the product does — verbatim, from its own page — and check them against the published trials for that molecule. A claim matches when the trials support it, reaches past them when the finding is smaller or in a different population than the claim implies, and is unsupported when no trial addresses it.
Is a company at the top of this board better than one at the bottom?
It describes its products more accurately. That is a real and unusual quality, and it is the only thing this board measures. It is not a judgment about clinical care, shipping, pricing or support, none of which we have assessed.
Does a company pay to be higher on this list?
Yes, in one specific and disclosed way: companies we have a paid relationship with are grouped above those we do not, and the statement printed at the top of every board says so. Nothing else about the order is for sale. Within the paid group and within the unpaid group the ranking is identical and entirely measured — claim accuracy first, then matching claims, then whether the company names its pharmacy, then whether it publishes a testing regime, then alphabetical order. No company can pay to change its counts, and the numbers shown beside every row are the same whether we are paid or not. If you would rather ignore the grouping, read the claims column: it is the whole of what this board measures.
Why does an FDA warning letter not push a company down?
Because a warning letter is a public regulatory communication, not a finding of illegal activity, and nearly every one in this market concerns marketing language rather than product quality. We disclose the letter on the row and on the review, and it does not move the ranking. Only a company ceasing to operate would remove it from the site.
Nothing pinned
Medical disclaimer: This content is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any treatment.