Head-to-head
Two compounds, searched together
These pairs get typed into search side by side far more often than any trial program has ever tested them side by side. Each page below shows what each compound’s own trials actually found — same population, same duration, same phase, laid out so you can see where the comparison is honest and where it isn’t.
3
5
The comparisons
Retatrutide vs. Tirzepatide
Retatrutide now has published phase 3 obesity results, but setting them beside tirzepatide’s results is not a head-to-head comparison. The studies enrolled different people, followed them for different periods and used their own analysis methods. Tirzepatide has approved prescription products; retatrutide remains investigational. The direct-comparison TRIUMPH-5 registry had no posted results when checked October 13, 2026.
Retatrutide
Evidence strength: Randomized trials. Randomized controlled trials in humans, at scale.
Tirzepatide
Evidence strength: Randomized trials. Randomized controlled trials in humans, at scale.
Semaglutide vs. Tirzepatide
Semaglutide and tirzepatide are the one pair on this site that has genuinely been randomized against each other. SURMOUNT-5 put 751 adults with obesity and without diabetes on the maximum tolerated dose of one drug or the other for 72 weeks, and tirzepatide came out ahead: a 20.2% average weight reduction against 13.7%. A second trial, SURPASS-2, compared them in type 2 diabetes and also favored tirzepatide, on blood sugar. That is the whole of the direct evidence, and it is narrower than the conclusion usually drawn from it — both trials were open-label, and both capped semaglutide below the highest dose its label now describes. Every other figure on this page is not a head-to-head result at all: it comes from a separate trial with its own placebo arm, its own population and its own duration. Here is what each trial actually reported.
Semaglutide
Evidence strength: Randomized trials. Randomized controlled trials in humans, at scale.
Tirzepatide
Evidence strength: Randomized trials. Randomized controlled trials in humans, at scale.
Sermorelin vs. Tesamorelin
Both stimulate the growth hormone pathway, but their evidence applies to different preparations and populations. Tesamorelin has an approved product for excess abdominal fat in adults with HIV-associated lipodystrophy. Sermorelin has historical diagnostic and pediatric research, with additional adult research involving related GHRH analogs. Geref is no longer marketed; FDA found its withdrawal was not for safety or effectiveness reasons. This is not a head-to-head comparison, and these records do not establish a winner for general wellness.
Sermorelin
Evidence strength: Randomized trials. Randomized controlled trials in humans, at scale.
Tesamorelin
Evidence strength: Randomized trials. Randomized controlled trials in humans, at scale.
Looking for one compound instead?
The peptide index goes deep on one molecule at a time, and peptides by goal ranks every compound against one outcome. How the evidence tiers shown above are set is on our methodology page.
Medical disclaimer: This content is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any treatment.